BitcoinCash/2021-CHIPs
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

TIL: we can shorten some URLS

Browse Source 
With thanks to admin Leandro Di Marco today I learned that
the URLs on bitcoincashresearch can be shortened to remove the
topic from there and just have the /t/num/ which is unique and
auto redirects.
This commit is contained in:
TomZ
2021-03-24 20:38:35 +01:00
parent 968a055873
commit 86f4671510
2 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
CHIP-2021-01-Allow Smaller Transactions.md
+4 -4
View File
@@ -53,20 +53,20 @@ To avoid the weakness in merkle-blocks we introduce the rule that transactions s
## References:
Discussion on [bitcoincashresearch](https://bitcoincashresearch.org/t/consensus-change-proposal-min-tx-size-of-100-bytes-instead-forbid-64-byte-txs/154)
Discussion on [bitcoincashresearch](https://bitcoincashresearch.org/t/154)
[Leaf-Node weakness in Bitcoin Merkle Tree Design](https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2018/06/09/leaf-node-weakness-in-bitcoin-merkle-tree-design/)
## Statements
**Freetrader, BCHN release manager.**
> I reviewed this and would support activation of this CHIP (revision [75b97e22a3dc295de7373255025f38cd0911b866](https://gitlab.com/bitcoin.cash/chips/-/blob/75b97e22a3dc295de7373255025f38cd0911b866/CHIP-2021-01-Allow%20Smaller%20Transactions.md)) in the first network upgrade after May 2021. ([source](https://bitcoincashresearch.org/t/consensus-change-proposal-min-tx-size-of-100-bytes-instead-forbid-64-byte-txs/154/32?u=tom))
> I reviewed this and would support activation of this CHIP (revision [75b97e22a3dc295de7373255025f38cd0911b866](https://gitlab.com/bitcoin.cash/chips/-/blob/75b97e22a3dc295de7373255025f38cd0911b866/CHIP-2021-01-Allow%20Smaller%20Transactions.md)) in the first network upgrade after May 2021. ([source](https://bitcoincashresearch.org/t/154/32))
**Benjamin Scherrey ([proteusguy](https://bitcoincashresearch.org/u/proteusguy)), ActorForth**
> I’ve reviewed the CHIP and support it as written. My interest is as a development stakeholder. ([source](https://bitcoincashresearch.org/t/consensus-change-proposal-min-tx-size-of-100-bytes-instead-forbid-64-byte-txs/154/31?u=tom))
> I’ve reviewed the CHIP and support it as written. My interest is as a development stakeholder. ([source](https://bitcoincashresearch.org/t/154/31))
**Andrew Stone, developer Bitcoin Unlimited**
> Awemany (working as a BU dev) and I originally brought this problem to the BCH community’s attention. When ABC chose to limit at 100 bytes I pointed out this was idiocy way back before the original fork, and was ignored. So BU is happy to support a change that fixes yet-another-dumb-decision autocratically made during the ABC days. ([source](https://bitcoincashresearch.org/t/consensus-change-proposal-min-tx-size-of-100-bytes-instead-forbid-64-byte-txs/154/36))
> Awemany (working as a BU dev) and I originally brought this problem to the BCH community’s attention. When ABC chose to limit at 100 bytes I pointed out this was idiocy way back before the original fork, and was ignored. So BU is happy to support a change that fixes yet-another-dumb-decision autocratically made during the ABC days. ([source](https://bitcoincashresearch.org/t/154/36))
## Copyright Notice