From c3e75b8683a7034021bc5e6b3a2c0e63debdefc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: TomZ Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:56:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix word --- readme.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/readme.md b/readme.md index 9703168..87b62e5 100644 --- a/readme.md +++ b/readme.md @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ The rationale there is based on the total issued supply of sats, however. Which It is fair to say that 1% of all coins will never be on a single input or output and as a result we could be mostly safe about adding an additional 2 digits for nearly free. It fits in the same 8 byte number, as long as no more than 1% of total issuable supply never ends up on a single UTXO. -The owners personal opinion is that in the far future if this is deemed needed and safe, we can simply do it then. Same trick with a new transaction version, but 50 years from now. We'd even be able to reuse the opcode and simply add an extra enum value. +The author's personal opinion is that in the far future if this is deemed needed and safe, we can simply do it then. Same trick with a new transaction version, but 50 years from now. We'd even be able to reuse the opcode and simply add an extra enum value. ## Why not wait?