You've already forked nakamoto-archive
Create 119.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
layout: forum
|
||||
title: 'Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin'
|
||||
grand_parent: Forum Posts
|
||||
parent: Bitcoin Forum
|
||||
nav_order: 119
|
||||
date: 2010-06-16 00:15:47 UTC
|
||||
original: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63.msg452#msg452
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin
|
||||
June 16, 2010, 12:15:47 AM
|
||||
|
||||
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=domain.com&amount=200.00&comment=order_12345
|
||||
or
|
||||
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=<bitcoinaddress><separatorchar>1.2.3.4&amount=200.00
|
||||
|
||||
But as long as the link is already doing the typing for you, I don't see much benefit in using a domain address instead of bitcoin address. With a bitcoin address, the user can't send an unidentified payment. They can't send payment until they've been given a correct bitcoin address to send to.
|
||||
|
||||
What would be nice about sending by domain is you could visually verify who it's going to.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
A more crucial issue is what if the browser isn't allowed to connect to 127.0.0.1:
|
||||
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63.msg1589#msg1589
|
||||
|
||||
and if that's true, then what about that example freenet link that had 127.0.0.1 in it?
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user