From 6313157101beb761678e486120f33640405dcae9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wakgill <76528604+wakgill@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 15:20:55 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Create 10.md

---
 docs/emails/bitcoin-list/10.md | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 docs/emails/bitcoin-list/10.md

diff --git a/docs/emails/bitcoin-list/10.md b/docs/emails/bitcoin-list/10.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..878613b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/emails/bitcoin-list/10.md
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+---
+layout: default
+title: “[bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1.5 released”
+grand_parent: Emails
+parent: bitcoin-list
+nav_order: 10
+---
+
+# Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
+
+The email on the Cryptography Mailing List that announced Bitcoin publicly to the world.
+{: .fs-6 .fw-300 } 
+
+---
+
+```
+Hal Finney wrote:
+> That sounds good. I'd also like to be able to run multiple coin/block
+> generators on multiple machines, all behind a single NAT address. I
+> haven't tried this yet so I don't know if it works on the current
+> software.
+
+The current version will work fine. They'll each connect over the
+Internet, while incoming connections only come to the host that
+port 8333 is routed to.
+
+As an optimisation, I'll make a switch "-connect=1.2.3.4" to make
+it only connect to a specific address. You could make your extra
+nodes connect to your primary, and only the primary connects over
+the Internet. It doesn't really matter for now, since the network
+would have to get huge before the bandwidth is anything more than
+trivial.
+
+
+> BTW I don't remember if we talked about this, but the other day some
+> people were mentioning secure timestamping. You want to be able to
+> prove that a certain document existed at a certain time in the past.
+> Seems to me that bitcoin's stack of blocks would be perfect for this.
+
+Indeed, Bitcoin is a distributed secure timestamp server for
+transactions. A few lines of code could create a transaction with
+an extra hash in it of anything that needs to be timestamped.
+I should add a command to timestamp a file that way.
+
+
+> > > Later I want to add interfaces to make it really easy to integrate
+> > > into websites from any server side language.
+>
+> Right, and I'd like to see more of a library interface that could be
+> called from programming or scripting languages, on the client side as
+> well.
+
+Exactly.
+
+
+Satoshi Nakamoto
+
+http://www.bitcoin.org
+```