From 6a26887381c432517b3269bf55bbab2cfbfbd973 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wakgill <76528604+wakgill@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 23:52:15 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Create 163.md

---
 docs/forum/bitcoin-forum/163.md | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 docs/forum/bitcoin-forum/163.md

diff --git a/docs/forum/bitcoin-forum/163.md b/docs/forum/bitcoin-forum/163.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..efc003d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/forum/bitcoin-forum/163.md
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+---
+layout: forum
+title: 'Re: Slashdot Submission for 1.0'
+grand_parent: Forum Posts
+parent: Bitcoin Forum
+nav_order: 163
+date: 2010-07-05 21:31:14 UTC
+original: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg1976#msg1976
+---
+
+# Re: Slashdot Submission for 1.0
+
+---
+
+```
+Re: Slashdot Submission for 1.0
+July 05, 2010, 09:31:14 PM	
+
+BTW, I did come to my senses after that brief bout with 1.3, this release is still going to be 0.3 beta not 1.0.
+
+I really appreciate the effort, but there are a lot of problems.
+
+We don't want to lead with "anonymous".  (I've been meaning to edit the homepage)
+
+"The developers expect that this will result in a stable-with-respect-to-energy currency outside the reach of any government." -- I am definitely not making an such taunt or assertion.
+
+It's not stable-with-respect-to-energy.  There was a discussion on this.  It's not tied to the cost of energy.  NLS's estimate based on energy was a good estimated starting point, but market forces will increasingly dominate.
+
+Sorry to be a wet blanket.  Writing a description for this thing for general audiences is bloody hard.  There's nothing to relate it to.
+```