You've already forked nakamoto-archive
Create 134.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
layout: forum
|
||||||
|
title: 'Re: 0.3 almost ready'
|
||||||
|
grand_parent: Forum Posts
|
||||||
|
parent: Bitcoin Forum
|
||||||
|
nav_order: 134
|
||||||
|
date: 2010-06-22 17:02:07 UTC
|
||||||
|
original: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60.msg446#msg446
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Re: 0.3 almost ready
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<div class="language-plaintext highlighter-rouge"><div class="highlight"><pre class="highlight">
|
||||||
|
<code>Re: 0.3 almost ready
|
||||||
|
June 22, 2010, 05:02:07 PM
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199.msg1658#msg1658">Quote from: lachesis on June 22, 2010, 06:20:02 AM</a>
|
||||||
|
-------------
|
||||||
|
It would be nice if the listtransactions RPC method were finished before the next release, though.
|
||||||
|
-------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
My fear is too many programmers would latch onto that for checking for received payments. It can never be reliable that way. The list/getreceivedbyaddress/label functions are the only way to do it reliably.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We shouldn't delay forever until every possible feature is done. There's always going to be one more thing to do.</code></pre></div></div>
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user