Create 1.md

2021-01-02 00:13:56 -06:00
parent 07a3741a87
commit f94b36f4db
1 changed files with 70 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+---
+layout: default
+title: 'Re: Bitcoin v0.1 released'
+date: 2009-01-12 18:52:45
+grand_parent: Emails
+parent: Dustin Trammel
+nav_order: 1
+---
+
+# Re: Bitcoin v0.1 released
+
+The email on the Cryptography Mailing List that announced Bitcoin publicly to the world.
+{: .fs-6 .fw-300 } 
+
+---
+
+```
+From satoshi@vistomail.com Mon Jan 12 18:52:45 2009
+Return-Path: <satoshi@vistomail.com>
+Delivered-To: dustintrammell-dtrammell@dustintrammell.com
+Received: (qmail 18309 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2009 18:52:45 -0000
+Received: from anonymousspeech.com (HELO mail.anonymousspeech.com)
+ (124.217.253.42) by oaklabs.net with SMTP; 12 Jan 2009 18:52:45 -0000
+Received: from server123 ([124.217.253.42]) by anonymousspeech.com with
+ MailEnable ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:42:42 +0800
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:33:28 +0800
+X-Mailer: Chilkat Software Inc (http://www.chilkatsoft.com)
+X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
+Subject: Re: Bitcoin v0.1 released
+Content-Type: text/plain
+From: "Satoshi Nakamoto" <satoshi@vistomail.com>
+Reply-To: satoshi@vistomail.com
+To: dtrammell@dustintrammell.com
+Message-ID: <CHILKAT-MID-8f43d6cf-f570-d943-f12d-ae24bbcf04c3@server123>
+X-Evolution-Source: pop://dustintrammell-dtrammell@mail.oaklabs.net/
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+> I'm currently reading through your paper.  At the timestamp server
+> section you mention newspapers and usenet, so I thought you might be
+> interested in this if you have not seen it already:
+>
+> http://www.publictimestamp.org/
+
+Thanks, I hadn't seen that yet.  It looks very well presented.
+There was an older one that's been running for a long time that
+publishes its hashes to Usenet.  I'm surprised this one isn't
+using Usenet, although it is kind of difficult to get access to
+post to Usenet in an automated way these days.  If they can get a
+magazine or newspaper to publish their hashes, it would work a lot
+easier in court for their purposes.  Bitcoin and all timestamp
+servers share the basic functionality of periodically collecting
+things into blocks and hashing them into a chain.
+
+
+> By the way, I'm also currently running the alpha code on one of my
+> workstations.  So far it has two "Generated" messages, however the
+> "Credit" field for those is 0.00 and the balance hasn't changed.  Is
+> this due to the age/maturity requirement for a coin to be valid?
+
+Right, the credit field stays 0.00 until it matures, then it'll be
+50.00.  Do you think it would be clearer if I left the credit
+field blank until it matures?  I should put some text in the
+transaction details (when you double click on it) explaining how
+it works.  (was it obvious you can doubleclick on a line for
+details?)
+
+Be sure to upgrade to v0.1.3 if you haven't already.  This version
+has really stabilized things.
+```