You've already forked nakamoto-archive
Create 172.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
layout: forum
|
||||
title: 'Re: Security'
|
||||
grand_parent: Forum Posts
|
||||
parent: Bitcoin Forum
|
||||
nav_order: 172
|
||||
date: 2010-07-10 12:58:02 UTC
|
||||
original: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240.msg2132#msg2132
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Re: Security
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Re: Security
|
||||
July 10, 2010, 12:58:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I'll start thinking about how to do this.
|
||||
|
||||
At the moment, you can kind of use -connect. You can use -connect to make it connect to local computers on your LAN, like -connect=192.168.0.100. If you start it out blank and don't let it connect to the main network, the difficulty is still at the original low difficulty. If you've port-forwarded though, then outside nodes might still connect inward to you.
|
||||
|
||||
With -connect it still uses IRC, do you think it shouldn't get on IRC when you're telling it to only connect to specific nodes with -connect? The main scenario for -connect is where you have a server farm, with two connected to the network and the rest connected to the first two. In that case, you wouldn't want the -connect computers on IRC.
|
||||
|
||||
void ThreadIRCSeed(void* parg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (mapArgs.count("-connect"))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user