Files
2021-01-08 23:52:15 -06:00

1.1 KiB

layout, title, grand_parent, parent, nav_order, date, original
layout title grand_parent parent nav_order date original
forum Re: Slashdot Submission for 1.0 Forum Posts Bitcoin Forum 163 2010-07-05 21:31:14 UTC https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg1976#msg1976

Re: Slashdot Submission for 1.0


Re: Slashdot Submission for 1.0
July 05, 2010, 09:31:14 PM	

BTW, I did come to my senses after that brief bout with 1.3, this release is still going to be 0.3 beta not 1.0.

I really appreciate the effort, but there are a lot of problems.

We don't want to lead with "anonymous".  (I've been meaning to edit the homepage)

"The developers expect that this will result in a stable-with-respect-to-energy currency outside the reach of any government." -- I am definitely not making an such taunt or assertion.

It's not stable-with-respect-to-energy.  There was a discussion on this.  It's not tied to the cost of energy.  NLS's estimate based on energy was a good estimated starting point, but market forces will increasingly dominate.

Sorry to be a wet blanket.  Writing a description for this thing for general audiences is bloody hard.  There's nothing to relate it to.