You've already forked nakamoto-archive
1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
layout, title, grand_parent, parent, nav_order, date, original
| layout | title | grand_parent | parent | nav_order | date | original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| forum | Re: bitcoin auto-renice-ing | Forum Posts | Bitcoin Forum | 86 | 2010-03-15 18:44:12 UTC | https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=72.msg717#msg717 |
Re: bitcoin auto-renice-ing
Re: bitcoin auto-renice-ing
March 15, 2010, 06:44:12 PM
It sets different priorities for each thread. The generate threads run at PRIO_MIN. The other threads rarely take any CPU and run at normal.
#define THREAD_PRIORITY_LOWEST PRIO_MIN
#define THREAD_PRIORITY_BELOW_NORMAL 2
#define THREAD_PRIORITY_NORMAL 0
The priorities converted from Windows priorities were probably from a table like this:
"The following table shows the mapping between nice values and Win32 priorities. Refer to the Win32 documentation for SetThreadPriority() for more information on Win32 priority issues.
nice value Win32 Priority
-20 to -16 THREAD_PRIORITY_HIGHEST
-15 to -6 THREAD_PRIORITY_ABOVE_NORMAL
-5 to +4 THREAD_PRIORITY_NORMAL
+5 to +14 THREAD_PRIORITY_BELOW_NORMAL
+15 to +19 THREAD_PRIORITY_LOWEST"
If you have better values, suggestions welcome.
Also, there was some advice on the web that PRIO_PROCESS is used on Linux because threads are processes. If that's not true, maybe it accounts for unexpectedly setting the priority of the whole app.
// threads are processes on linux, so PRIO_PROCESS affects just the one thread
setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, getpid(), nPriority);
```