We now removed the need for Boost:chrono in all the libs, to avoid
accidentally linking to it again this change makes the apps link to
the actual specific libs instead of just all.
These are technically static libs, but not in any way shared libs.
They are used solely only by this repo and really only by the hub.
Most important, no header files are installed and basically none of
the normal rules for reusable libraries are applied to these files.
Small refactor; move the partition check away from main and the obsolete
global variables we used to use, instead now just add it to the DB which
owns the data it works on.
This fixes the bug that in various cases we'd incorrectly get a warning
about no blocks being found in the last N hours.
This is part of the protocol upgrade for 2020-05-15, and in general it
seems to go the direction of "we did this before, lets do this again".
The spec is clear enough, but there is still a lack of questioning and
testing. The problem this attempts to fix has been neutered for years[1].
The spec states:
> The essential idea of SigChecks is to perform counting solely in the
> spending transaction, and count actual executed signature check
> operations.
This, however nobel and logical, ignores that the
check-for-being-too-costly just pulled in a UTXO lookup and the loading
of the output script from the historical chain.
The goal that we protect against CPU over-use may be reached, but the
price is a total system slowdown. You can have multiple CPUs, but the
bus to permanent storage has one, max 2 parallel pipes.
To ensure theHub stays the number one scalable node, I didn't blindly
follow the spec, while making sure that the Hub is correctly going to
follow/reject consensus violations of newly mined blocks.
As a result the implementation in Flowee the Hub:
* does not check sigcheck-counts on historical blocks (more than 1000
blocks in the past).
This may increase the risk of chain-splits ever so slightly, but the cost
of disk-IO would be too high.
* No longer stores the value in the mempool, nor uses it for the
CPU-miner.
* Ties the sigcheck-limits to the user-set block-size-accept-limit.
This is contrary to the spec which mistakenly thinks that BCH has a
max block-size in the consensus rules. The effect is the same, though.
* The per-intput standardness suggestion is not implemented because
standardness checks don't currently fetch the previous outputs and
that would be too expensive to add.
* Standardness rules for the whole transaction are moved to the
mempool-acceptance logic instead. The cost would be too great
otherwise, similar to the previous point.
Again, the effect is the same as likely intented.
---
1) since the intro of the CachingTransactionSignatureChecker
Merkle-block and merkle-tree classes and methods are pretty much stand-
alone and can be moved with no efforts.
Also move the relevent unit test to qtestlib.
Move some files back to the server "library".
Merge the 'console' lib with server, as it doesn't really make sense with
just one file and nobody exclusively linking to it.
The server "libary" is not really a library, its the place we put all
the files shared by hub-qt hub-cli and hub.
We no longer depend on these files from other places (mostly due to
moving to the new logging framework) and as such we can move the files
back.
We used various ways to enable new features over the last 10 years.
We can remove that legacy code and just set the blockheight.
This cleans up the code quite a bit.
This removes the attempt at magic (predicting future) component
called the fee-estimator.
The direct effect is that all transactions have as a mempool acceptance
the same minimum fee. Regardless of how full the mempool or blocks were.
This mempool-acceptance minimum fee is 0 sat/byte. (aka free)
Notice the node-wide free-tx accept-limiter is going to avoid us getting
overloaded.
as the number of applications grows it makes more sense to separate
the 'server' library from the actually reusable libraries.
To recap, the 'server' library is what we started with when importing
all the code from the hub. Slowly we are moving good code out that
is stand-alone and reusable.
As boost testlib is extremely IDE unfriendly, as well as human
unfriendly with lots of macros for basic C++ functions (like methods!!)
this is better for me.
But the real reason is that its just unstable. I get double deletes
on some releases of boost and I'm missing plain features that all
other test frameworks have.
For instance a QCOMPARE shows what is expected vs what we got. Boost
just fails.
In QTestLib I can mark a test as "expect fail" an idea that boost
tried and failed (can easily create false positives).
Duplicate the test_bitcoin file into the common dir,
I hope to remove the original in future.
Make the common dir a new static lib and create a new
qtestlib based unit test out of the old doublespend unit test.
The new UnspentOutputDatabase classes are only very loosly a database, we
purely register and store unspent outputs there. But unline a DB we don't
allow modification (just insert and delete).
This replaces the coin-db (which was based on leveldb) and as first goal
this gives us a higher level of stability. The level-database was known
to give corruption issues.
Notice that users will need to do a manual reindex on first update.
tomFlowee
TomZ