With the expansion of the database more agressive, checking a
larger set of peers for one that works becomes more important, as
such open more connections ever cycle if we can't find good ones
after half a minute.
With the expansion of the database more agressive, checking a
larger set of items for the best one becomes more important, as
such do a 10x for finding the best sccoring item.
The observed effect is finding previously useful peers within seconds
instead of a minute.
When our addresses database is filled with old or wrong addresses, we
end up trying to connect to a large number of IPs before we find actual
peers.
When we see that is the case, let's try to find more IP addresses from
our peers.
When we didn't personally verify the services, don't judge the IP based
on them and connect anyway.
In addition to not trusting the services we receive from the net, be
more careful with the usage of the 'lastConnected' field.
Notice that we don't actually use the result of that variable in the end
if the everConnected is likewise incorrect.
this introduces a new version of the address-db, as stored in the db
file itself. Causing a one-time 'upgrade'.
Main issue solved is that the 'everSeen' bool was restored incorrectly
and from then on out saved wrong too.
This may have caused bad selection of peers to connect to as the DB
grew.
Together with the various bugs in the last months update we also reset
the punishment to not avoid connecting to possibly perfectly fine peers.
A connection that is 'shutdown' now ensures one more time we'll call
onDisconnected() (is it was..) allowing the application level logic to
get notified and avoid memory leaks.
This allows us to use a shared pointer while at the same time not having
the problem that a peer de-registration hits an already deleted
PrivacySegment.
When the user-layer triggers a re-connect instead of waiting for the
layer to re-connect then we should avoid doing work twice.
This also avoids a reconnect in some cases.
The AddressDB stores separately the ipv4 and ipv6 addresses, ensuring
that the caller only receives IP addresess compatible with what they
asked.
Until now the booleans to define this were simply private members of the
DB and ipv6 was off.
This exposes those boolean to the outside world.
When a peer sends us an 'addr' message it includes the time they report
they last connected to it. This is untrusted data and we should not act
on it for our our connectivity stats.
Last year we started wrapping the Peer object in a shared pointer,
which is used now in the managers.
This continues the idea by making the PrivacySegment use smart
pointers too and the P2PNetInterface is changed to do the same
for downstream applications.
As we moved most of the creation of a BufferPool to be via the
Streaming::pool() method, which uses a thread-local, it makes sense
to start cleaning up the design and make it more modern C++.
The above mentioned method would return a reference and you'd see
loads of places use `auto &pool =` which is less than ideal.
As the number of places where we actually instantiate a BufferPool
goes down, the usage of some sort of smart pointer makes more sense.
This now makes all APIs use BufferPool be wrapped in a shared_ptr.
This follows the coding style guideline that the file that contains a
class should follow the exact name of this (main) class.
key.{h|cpp} -> PrivateKey.{h|cpp}
This follows the coding style guideline that the file that contains a
class should follow the exact name of this (main) class.
pubkey.{h|cpp} -> PublicKey.{h|cpp}
pubkey_utils.{h|cpp} -> PublicKeyUtils.{h|cpp}
The system writes a new file every single run (provided new headers were
received) and we sometimes compact them into a big file again.
The code forgot to remove the newly introduced info files of the old
files it compacted. Leaving confusing things happening after.
This solves that by making the first run remove all info files and re-
build them, adding a version byte to allow us freedom to do that in the
future again.
The bchd seed owner says that since there are no bchd nodes on main-chain
due to the code being outdated, the seed is empty.
We hope this will change in the future, but for now it makes no sense to
query it since it will just generate a fail.
This improves several corner cases on detecting if a peer we
are requesting headers from is actually giving them to us.
Specifically, the height could be zero for a genesis-only view, which
caused the detection to always give the higest score (height zero is
seen as special).
After a node is disconnected we now also reset the history in order to
let the new node get measured from only its own performance.
tomFlowee