As this is not actually used outside of the Hub, it really makes
more sense to make this testing part of the hub testing.
Also makes it easier to compile.
As boost testlib is extremely IDE unfriendly, as well as human
unfriendly with lots of macros for basic C++ functions (like methods!!)
this is better for me.
But the real reason is that its just unstable. I get double deletes
on some releases of boost and I'm missing plain features that all
other test frameworks have.
For instance a QCOMPARE shows what is expected vs what we got. Boost
just fails.
In QTestLib I can mark a test as "expect fail" an idea that boost
tried and failed (can easily create false positives).
tomFlowee
TomZ