You've already forked CHIP-MilliSatoshi
Fix word
This commit is contained in:
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ The rationale there is based on the total issued supply of sats, however. Which
|
||||
|
||||
It is fair to say that 1% of all coins will never be on a single input or output and as a result we could be mostly safe about adding an additional 2 digits for nearly free. It fits in the same 8 byte number, as long as no more than 1% of total issuable supply never ends up on a single UTXO.
|
||||
|
||||
The owners personal opinion is that in the far future if this is deemed needed and safe, we can simply do it then. Same trick with a new transaction version, but 50 years from now. We'd even be able to reuse the opcode and simply add an extra enum value.
|
||||
The author's personal opinion is that in the far future if this is deemed needed and safe, we can simply do it then. Same trick with a new transaction version, but 50 years from now. We'd even be able to reuse the opcode and simply add an extra enum value.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why not wait?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user