You've already forked nakamoto-archive
23 lines
757 B
Markdown
23 lines
757 B
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
layout: forum
|
||
|
|
title: 'Re: 1.3 almost ready'
|
||
|
|
grand_parent: Forum Posts
|
||
|
|
parent: Bitcoin Forum
|
||
|
|
nav_order: 155
|
||
|
|
date: 2010-06-27 15:30:13 UTC
|
||
|
|
original: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199.msg1834#msg1834
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Re: 1.3 almost ready
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
Re: 1.3 almost ready
|
||
|
|
June 27, 2010, 03:30:13 PM
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
MinGW still only has good old stable 3.4.5. There's not much reason for them to update it.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
When I looked at the 3.4.5 compiled SHA disassembly, I couldn't see any room for improvement at all. I can't imagine how 8% more could be squeezed out of it. Is it possible Windows could have 8% more overhead? Not making system calls or anything, just plain busy computational code, could task switching and other housekeeping operations take away that much?
|
||
|
|
```
|