You've already forked nakamoto-archive
wakgill
757 B
757 B
layout, title, grand_parent, parent, nav_order, date, original
| layout | title | grand_parent | parent | nav_order | date | original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| forum | Re: 1.3 almost ready | Forum Posts | Bitcoin Forum | 155 | 2010-06-27 15:30:13 UTC | https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199.msg1834#msg1834 |
Re: 1.3 almost ready
Re: 1.3 almost ready
June 27, 2010, 03:30:13 PM
MinGW still only has good old stable 3.4.5. There's not much reason for them to update it.
When I looked at the 3.4.5 compiled SHA disassembly, I couldn't see any room for improvement at all. I can't imagine how 8% more could be squeezed out of it. Is it possible Windows could have 8% more overhead? Not making system calls or anything, just plain busy computational code, could task switching and other housekeeping operations take away that much?