You've already forked nakamoto-archive
wakgill
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
layout: forum
|
|
title: 'Re: 0.3 almost ready'
|
|
grand_parent: Forum Posts
|
|
parent: Bitcoin Forum
|
|
nav_order: 141
|
|
date: 2010-06-25 02:17:41 UTC
|
|
original: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199.msg1760#msg1760
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Re: 0.3 almost ready
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Re: 0.3 almost ready
|
|
June 25, 2010, 02:17:41 AM
|
|
|
|
I don't know. Maybe someone with more Linux experience knows how to install the library it needs.
|
|
|
|
I built it on Ubuntu 10.04. I hope that wasn't a mistake. Maybe it should have been built on an older version for more backward compatibility. Is this a problem on Linux, that if you build on the latest version, then it has trouble working on older versions? Is there any way I can downgrade to an older version of GCC on 10.04?
|
|
|
|
The 64-bit version shouldn't be any faster than the 32-bit version, but it would be great if someone could do a side-by-side comparison of the two linux versions and check. SHA-256 is a 32-bit algorithm and nothing in BitcoinMiner uses 64-bit at all.
|
|
|
|
We don't need to bother with a 64-bit version for Windows. 32-bit programs work on all versions of Windows. It's not like Linux where the 64-bit OS wants 64-bit programs.
|
|
|
|
I'm also curious if it's a little faster on linux than windows.
|
|
|
|
Do you think I should make the directories:
|
|
/bin32/
|
|
/bin64/
|
|
instead of
|
|
/bin/32/
|
|
/bin/64/
|
|
```
|