You've already forked nakamoto-archive
wakgill
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
layout, title, grand_parent, parent, nav_order, date, original
| layout | title | grand_parent | parent | nav_order | date | original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| forum | Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin | Forum Posts | Bitcoin Forum | 119 | 2010-06-16 00:15:47 UTC | https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55.msg1596#msg1596 |
Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin
Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin
June 16, 2010, 12:15:47 AM
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=domain.com&amount=200.00&comment=order_12345
or
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=<bitcoinaddress><separatorchar>1.2.3.4&amount=200.00
But as long as the link is already doing the typing for you, I don't see much benefit in using a domain address instead of bitcoin address. With a bitcoin address, the user can't send an unidentified payment. They can't send payment until they've been given a correct bitcoin address to send to.
What would be nice about sending by domain is you could visually verify who it's going to.
A more crucial issue is what if the browser isn't allowed to connect to 127.0.0.1:
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63.msg1589#msg1589
and if that's true, then what about that example freenet link that had 127.0.0.1 in it?