You've already forked nakamoto-archive
wakgill
33 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
33 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
layout: forum
|
|
title: 'Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin'
|
|
grand_parent: Forum Posts
|
|
parent: Bitcoin Forum
|
|
nav_order: 119
|
|
date: 2010-06-16 00:15:47 UTC
|
|
original: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55.msg1596#msg1596
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin
|
|
June 16, 2010, 12:15:47 AM
|
|
|
|
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=domain.com&amount=200.00&comment=order_12345
|
|
or
|
|
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=<bitcoinaddress><separatorchar>1.2.3.4&amount=200.00
|
|
|
|
But as long as the link is already doing the typing for you, I don't see much benefit in using a domain address instead of bitcoin address. With a bitcoin address, the user can't send an unidentified payment. They can't send payment until they've been given a correct bitcoin address to send to.
|
|
|
|
What would be nice about sending by domain is you could visually verify who it's going to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A more crucial issue is what if the browser isn't allowed to connect to 127.0.0.1:
|
|
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63.msg1589#msg1589
|
|
|
|
and if that's true, then what about that example freenet link that had 127.0.0.1 in it?
|
|
```
|